Statement: Quality has a price tag. India is allocating plenty of funds to education. Conclusions: I. Quality of education in India would improve. II. Funding alone can enhance the quality of education. Which conclusion(s) logically follow? MCQ with Answer and Explanation
Statement:
Quality has a price tag. India is allocating plenty of funds to education.
Conclusions:
I. Quality of education in India would improve.
II. Funding alone can enhance the quality of education.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Only conclusion II follows
B. Neither I nor II follows
C. Only conclusion I follows
D. Both I and II follow
Answer: Option C
Solution (By JKExamLibrary)
The statement sets up a correlation between price (funds) and quality. If India is allocating funds to education, it logically follows that the intended quality would improve (I). However, the statement doesn't claim funding *alone* is sufficient without proper execution (II does not follow).
Statement:
In a recent survey, 80% of employees preferred remote work over office work to maintain a work-life balance.
Conclusions:
I. Office work completely destroys work-life balance.
II. Work-life balance is a priority for a majority of employees.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
Explanation:
The statement shows a preference, not an absolute destructive nature of office work (Conclusion I is extreme). Because 80% (a majority) made a choice based on maintaining it, Conclusion II logically follows.
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!