Statement: The government run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income. Conclusions: I. The employees of this company do not seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary. II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first. MCQ with Answer and Explanation

Question

Statement: The government run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.
Conclusions:
I. The employees of this company do not seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.
II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.

A. Both conclusions I and II follow

B. Neither conclusion I nor II follows

C. Only conclusion I follows

D. Only conclusion II follows

Answer: Option C

Solution (By JKExamLibrary)

Conclusion I follows because strong resistance to declaring income may indicate they have nothing to hide and are protesting on principle. Conclusion II is not mentioned in the statement.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion

Request complete Subject PDF

Discuss this Question (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Practice More Statement and Conclusion Questions

Question #1

Share Report

Statements:
1. Some papers are files.
2. Some files are folders.
Conclusions:
I. Some papers are folders.
II. All folders are papers.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?

A. Only conclusion II follows

B. Only conclusion I follows

C. Both I and II follow

D. Neither I nor II follows

View Answer & Solution Discuss

Get Complete Subject PDF for Reasoning

Correct Answer: Option D

Explanation:
A 'some' relationship does not chain logically. There is no direct link established between papers and folders. Therefore, neither conclusion can be logically deduced.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion

Question #2

Share Report

Statement: No dogs are allowed in the mall. Conclusions: I. Security guards check for dogs. II. This rule applies to all visitors.

A. Only II follows

B. Both I and II follow

C. Neither I nor II follows

D. Only I follows

View Answer & Solution Discuss

Get Complete Subject PDF for Reasoning

Correct Answer: Option A

Explanation:
I: implementation method not stated. II: the rule is universal, so it follows.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion

Question #3

Share Report

Statements:
1. All squares are triangles.
2. No triangle is a circle.
Conclusions:
I. No square is a circle.
II. No circle is a square.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?

A. Both I and II follow

B. Neither I nor II follows

C. Only conclusion II follows

D. Only conclusion I follows

View Answer & Solution Discuss

Get Complete Subject PDF for Reasoning

Correct Answer: Option A

Explanation:
Since all squares are inside the triangle category, and nothing in the triangle category touches the circle category, squares and circles can never overlap. Therefore, both 'No square is a circle' and 'No circle is a square' are true.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion

Explore All Statement and Conclusion MCQs