Statement: The meteorology department has predicted heavy rainfall and thunderstorms for the next 48 hours. Conclusions: I. Citizens should carry umbrellas when going out. II. Flights might get delayed or cancelled. Which conclusion(s) logically follow? MCQ with Answer and Explanation

Statement:
The meteorology department has predicted heavy rainfall and thunderstorms for the next 48 hours.
Conclusions:
I. Citizens should carry umbrellas when going out.
II. Flights might get delayed or cancelled.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Both I and II follow
D. Neither I nor II follows
Answer: Option C
Solution (By JKExamLibrary)
Both conclusions are logical inferences based on the prediction of severe weather. Carrying an umbrella is a logical precaution, and severe thunderstorms logically impact aviation schedules.

Discuss this Question (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Practice More Statement and Conclusion Questions

Question #1
Statements:
1. Some phones are smart.
2. No smart thing is cheap.
Conclusions:
I. Some phones are not cheap.
II. No phone is cheap.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Neither I nor II follows
C. Both I and II follow
D. Only conclusion II follows

Correct Answer: Option A


Explanation:
The phones that are smart cannot be cheap (since no smart thing is cheap). Therefore, at least some phones are definitely not cheap (Conclusion I). We don't know about the phones that are not smart, so II does not follow.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #2
Statement:
If India wins the match, a public holiday will be declared.
Conclusions:
I. India won the match, so a public holiday was declared.
II. A public holiday was declared, so India must have won the match.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow from the given rule?
A. Only conclusion II follows
B. Neither I nor II follows
C. Both I and II follow
D. Only conclusion I follows

Correct Answer: Option D


Explanation:
The statement represents 'If A then B' (A implies B). Therefore, if A happens, B definitely happens (Conclusion I). However, B could happen for other reasons (e.g., a festival), so B does not necessarily imply A (Conclusion II is a logical fallacy known as affirming the consequent).

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #3
Statement: The alarm is ringing. Conclusions: I. There is an emergency. II. It is time to wake up.
A. Only I follows
B. Both I and II follow
C. Only II follows
D. Neither I nor II follows

Correct Answer: Option D


Explanation:
Alarm could be a security alarm or a wake-up alarm; neither can be conclusively determined. Neither follows.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion