Statement: From all available cultural records, it is evident that even in ancient India, both the masters and disciples valued not the quantity but the quality of knowledge.
Conclusions:
I. Giving importance to quantity of knowledge is meaningless.
II. There was an identity of educational values between teachers and students in ancient India.
Explanation:
Conclusion I follows as valuing quality over quantity implies giving importance only to quantity is meaningless. Conclusion II does not follow; while both valued quality, this does not establish a complete identity of all educational values.
Explanation:
Neither necessarily follows. A professional dancer may be self-taught; not all professional dancers perform on stage (some teach). So, neither is certain.
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!