Statement: All birds have wings. Conclusions: I. Penguins are birds, so they have wings. II. Bats have wings, so they are birds. MCQ with Answer and Explanation

Statement: All birds have wings. Conclusions: I. Penguins are birds, so they have wings. II. Bats have wings, so they are birds.
A. Neither I nor II follows
B. Both I and II follow
C. Only I follows
D. Only II follows
Answer: Option C
Solution (By JKExamLibrary)
I follows from the general rule 'all birds have wings' applied to penguins. II is a fallacy; having wings doesn't make a bat a bird. Only I follows.

Discuss this Question (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Practice More Statement and Conclusion Questions

Question #1
Statements:
1. All cars are vehicles.
2. Some vehicles are not machines.
Conclusions:
I. Some cars are not machines.
II. All vehicles are cars.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Both I and II follow
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Neither I nor II follows
D. Only conclusion I follows

Correct Answer: Option C


Explanation:
We know all cars are vehicles, but the vehicles that are not machines might be entirely outside the 'cars' circle. Therefore, Conclusion I is not definite. Conclusion II is a reverse of an 'All' statement, which is generally invalid. Neither follows.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #2
Statement: She is the CEO of the company. Conclusions: I. She has authority to make major decisions. II. She founded the company.
A. Both I and II follow
B. Only I follows
C. Neither I nor II follows
D. Only II follows

Correct Answer: Option B


Explanation:
CEO has decision-making authority (I). Not all CEOs are founders, so II does not follow.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #3
Statement: The water in the lake is crystal clear. Conclusions: I. The lake is not polluted. II. There are fish in the lake.
A. Only I follows
B. Only II follows
C. Both I and II follow
D. Neither I nor II follows

Correct Answer: Option A


Explanation:
Clear water suggests no pollution (I). Presence of fish is not guaranteed; could be no fish. So I follows.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion