Statement: 'We follow some of the best and effective teaching learning practices used by leading institutes all over the world' - A statement of a Professor of M.N. Institute.
Conclusions:
I. The M.N. Institute is one of the leading Institutes of the world.
II. Whatever is being followed by world's leading institutes will definitely be good and useful.
Explanation:
Neither conclusion follows. Following some practices of leading institutes does not make M.N. Institute a leading institute itself (I). Conclusion II is an overgeneralization; the statement only says they follow 'some of the best' practices, not that everything followed by leading institutes is good.
Statement: The government run company had asked its employees to declare their income and assets but it has been strongly resisted by employees union and no employee is going to declare his income.
Conclusions:
I. The employees of this company do not seem to have any additional undisclosed income besides their salary.
II. The employee's union wants all senior officers to declare their income first.
Explanation:
Conclusion I follows because strong resistance to declaring income may indicate they have nothing to hide and are protesting on principle. Conclusion II is not mentioned in the statement.
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!