Statement: After collision of two vessels in the sea all the crewmen and passengers are declared as missing - A news report. Conclusions: I. No one from the two vessels has survived after the collision. II. A few persons from the two vessels may have survived and are missing. MCQ with Answer and Explanation

Statement: After collision of two vessels in the sea all the crewmen and passengers are declared as missing - A news report.
Conclusions:
I. No one from the two vessels has survived after the collision.
II. A few persons from the two vessels may have survived and are missing.
A. Both conclusions I and II follow
B. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
C. Only conclusion II follows
D. Only conclusion I follows
Answer: Option D
Solution (By JKExamLibrary)
Conclusion I follows because 'declared missing' in such contexts implies no survivors have been found, so it can be concluded that no one survived. Conclusion II is contradictory; if some may have survived, they would not all be declared missing without hope.

Discuss this Question (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Practice More Statement and Conclusion Questions

Question #1
Statement: Children love ice cream. Conclusions: I. Ice cream is the only thing children love. II. Some children may dislike ice cream.
A. Only II follows
B. Neither I nor II follows
C. Both I and II follow
D. Only I follows

Correct Answer: Option B


Explanation:
I is too absolute. II contradicts the statement; 'children love ice cream' as a general statement doesn't allow 'some may dislike' if it's a universal claim. If it's taken as all children, then II contradicts; if it's a generic statement, II still cannot be deduced. Typically in reasoning, such a statement means 'all children', so II does not follow. Neither follows.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #2
Statements:
1. No cat is a dog.
2. No dog is a rat.
Conclusions:
I. No cat is a rat.
II. Some cats are rats.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Neither I nor II follows
B. Either I or II follows
C. Only conclusion II follows
D. Only conclusion I follows

Correct Answer: Option B


Explanation:
When there are two negative statements, no definitive positive or negative relationship can be established between the subject of the first and the predicate of the second (cat and rat). Since I and II form a complementary pair covering all possibilities, either I or II must be true.

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion
Question #3
Statements:
1. Some pens are not pencils.
2. All pencils are markers.
Conclusions:
I. Some pens are not markers.
II. Some markers are pencils.
Which conclusion(s) logically follow?
A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Both I and II follow
C. Neither I nor II follows
D. Only conclusion II follows

Correct Answer: Option D


Explanation:
Even if some pens are not pencils, those pens could still be markers (because the marker category is larger than the pencil category). Thus, I does not follow. Since all pencils are markers, some markers are definitely pencils (II follows).

This question belongs to: Reasoning Statement and Conclusion